Your comparison isn’t valid for a few reasons: You then tried to refute his claims (and move the original topic from minimum supported configuration to minimum supported configuration with all graphical features enabled) by saying: The claim of Vista’s higher requirements was proven baseless by averycfay posting Vista’s system requirements and linking you to that information on Microsoft’s website. One could argue that it’s rather amazing that they’re willing to support the minimum systems they do at all, given how similar operating systems have much higher requirements (e.g. ![]() Your original claim was that Vista had higher system requirements than Leopard and that it was “amazing” that Apple was willing to support such low-end systems where Microsoft did not. ![]() Vista does a lot of feature scaling based on the speed of the CPU, not just the GPU itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |